Most service businesses are paying for six different AI tools that nobody fully uses. We deploy Claude Code, open-source agents, and a custom orchestration layer that automate the work you would otherwise hire software or staff to do, plus our proprietary lead-generation software in your pipeline. Run as a managed service where we handle the agents for you, or transferred to your operator on day 90. Either way, the systems live in your accounts.
ChatGPT for marketing copy. Claude for legal review. Copilot for engineering. Three custom GPTs nobody opens. A Notion AI feature your team forgot was paid for. None of it talks to your CRM, your billing system, your support inbox. The output stays in browser tabs and never makes it into the actual business process.
That's not an AI problem. The model itself was solved two years ago. What's missing is the orchestration layer: the prompts that match your operations, the data plumbing that lets agents actually act, and an operator on staff who actually runs the system. Building that is what we do.
Companies that have actually deployed AI inside their workflows are reporting 30% delivery velocity improvements, 60% reductions in document-processing costs, and over a month per year reclaimed in administrative time. Companies that are still buying AI subscriptions and hoping their teams use them are paying the same vendor bills with none of the throughput.
The gap is widening monthly. The orchestration layer that takes 90 days to build today will take six months in 2027 because the teams who built it first are already on the next thing. There's no version of the next 24 months where waiting is the right call.
Each is scoped to a specific outcome. You can start with the audit and decide which engagements to commission. None of these are theoretical, we run versions of all four inside Formacha's own operations.
Anthropic's agentic CLI installed across your team. We set up the workspace, write the system prompts that match your operations, train your senior operators on autonomous workflows (planning agents, sub-agents, hooks, MCP servers), and ship the first three internal tools your team will use daily. Typical first deployments: invoice processing, internal dashboards, customer follow-up automation, code review for non-engineering teams, document Q&A.
OpenCode, Aider, Cline, n8n with self-hosted open-weight models (Llama, Qwen, Mistral), or any combination. For operators who want lower per-user cost, on-prem deployment, or specific tooling for regulated workflows. We architect the agent stack, deploy the models on your infrastructure, wire up the integrations, and document the runbook so your team owns it after we leave.
The glue layer. We connect your existing tools (CRM, billing, support, marketing) to whichever agent stack you've chosen. We build the internal copilots, document processing pipelines, market intelligence systems, and the agent loops that compound. An agent that watches your inbox, triages, and drafts replies. An agent that monitors competitor pricing and surfaces moves weekly. An agent that reviews your sales calls and grades your reps. The orchestration layer is the part that produces the actual ROI.
Our in-house software, deployed for you. Scrapes, scores, enriches, and routes high-intent leads at scale across the channels that actually convert for your vertical (Google Maps, LinkedIn, Apollo, Smartlead, custom signal sources). The same engine we use to build pipeline for our own marketing clients, with attribution tied back to closed contracts. Stand-alone or stacked with the other three engagements.
Each one replaced a piece of the client's previous workflow that did not scale, and each one runs without the client manually managing the agents day-to-day. Real systems, real businesses, real numbers from the last twelve months.
The same deployment, two operating models. Most clients pick managed and never look back.
We deploy and run the systems. You see outputs, leads coming into your CRM, daily reports landing in your inbox, invoices processed, ads running. You don't see (or have to think about) the underlying agents, prompts, or infrastructure. We're effectively a fractional AI team for your business. This replaces software you would otherwise rent, or staff you would otherwise hire.
Same deployment, but at the end of the engagement we transfer everything to your in-house operator with full runbooks. You own the agents, the prompts, the infrastructure. We can stay on for high-leverage additions or step back entirely. Your call.
The systems we build live in your accounts, your repos, your infrastructure. You can switch from managed to in-house at any time without rebuild. We don't gatekeep access, hold deployment keys, or charge for the privilege of leaving.
We're not an AI consultancy that pivoted from web design last quarter. We deploy this stack daily for our own marketing agency. The engagements we run with clients are the same systems, contextualized.
Scrapes Google Maps across configured cities weekly, enriches via Clay, routes to Smartlead with personalized cold outbound. Fully autonomous. Built on Claude Code with a custom Python agent layer. Powers Formacha's own client acquisition.
AI-driven newsletter and drip composition with a stop-slop quality filter. Resend integration, segmented audiences, scheduled sends. Composes, edits, and dispatches without manual copywriting. Used for nurture sequences and product drops.
AI-driven blog topic ideation via SERP gap analysis, SEO and AEO optimized drafting, automated rendering into static HTML, sitemap regeneration, and one-command deploy. Three weekly publishing cadence with editorial gate.
Brand DNA briefs, copy generation across platforms, image generation through Nano Banana and FAL endpoints, format adaptation across platforms. End-to-end through Claude Code subagents. Output goes directly to Meta Ads Manager.
We map your current tooling, the workflows where AI would actually move the needle, and the integration points that matter. Output is a written 90-day deployment plan with specific tools, agents, integrations, and outcomes. You can take this and execute internally if you want. (Most don't.) The audit is a paid engagement on its own. If you commission the implementation, the audit fee is credited.
We build. Senior operators only, no juniors learning on your spend. Weekly syncs with your team. Live deployment as we go, no big-reveal at the end. You're using working systems by week 4 and watching the rest of the stack come online piece by piece. Source code, prompts, runbooks, and access keys go into your accounts as we ship.
Two paths, your choice. Most clients keep us on as a managed service, where we own the agents, monitor performance, ship new ones as they're needed, and the in-house team only sees outputs (reports, leads, invoices processed, daily summaries). The other path is operator handoff: we train your in-house person on the runbooks, transfer every account, and step back. The systems are portable either way, you can switch from managed to in-house at any time without rebuild.
We turn down more engagements than we take. AI deployment done badly is worse than no AI at all. If your business doesn't have the operational complexity, the team capacity, or the budget tolerance to make this worth doing, we'll say so on the audit call.
Formacha runs an internal AI stack we built ourselves: lead generation, ad creative, content publishing, email orchestration, ad account management. We deploy Claude Code daily in our own work, including the agent that wrote part of the page you are reading right now.
Two practitioners who have shipped AI inside operating businesses, not slide decks. No dedicated "AI sales engineer" buffer. When you book a call, you talk to the senior operator who would actually deploy your engagement. We have a marketing agency practice (security firms, residential solar installers) and a product practice. The AI consulting work is built on top of the stack we use to run those.
We will never be the biggest AI consultancy. We will always be the one whose senior operator answers the phone.
Our engagements range from a focused audit-only engagement to full multi-pillar implementation across the four engagements above. We don't list pricing because the right number depends on which engagements you commission, the integration surface area, and the throughput we need to hit. Every engagement is priced so a single durable internal system pays for the entire investment within twelve months.
If we do not see a path to that payback during the audit, we tell you and refund the audit fee. We have done this before.
Eight to twelve weeks for a standard implementation. The audit phase alone is two weeks. We can compress the timeline for more urgent deployments, but we don't recommend it for first engagements.
Audit-only engagements start in the low five figures. Full implementations across the four engagements scale with scope. Quoted on the audit call after we have seen your numbers. No surprise pricing.
We can stay on retainer for ongoing optimization and new agent additions. The runbooks are also designed to be operator-friendly, written by people who run them daily, not by people who handed them off and moved on.
Yes. We have shipped HIPAA-adjacent and finance-adjacent workflows. The open-source AI integration engagement is specifically designed for data-sovereignty needs.
The orchestration layer is what matters, not the specific agent runtime. We design for tool-portability where it makes sense. The integrations and prompts we build for you are not locked to any single vendor.
Yes. Standard mutual NDA before the audit kickoff, before any data or systems get shared.
We can, but you probably don't need us for that. Our engagements are for businesses where the agent stack actually changes how the business operates. If you just want a smarter chatbot, you can do that in an afternoon yourself.
Three minutes. After you submit, you'll be routed to our calendar to book a 45-minute scoping call with the senior operator who would actually deploy your engagement.
If the form does not load, open it in a new window.